A brief post from David Janes, which I quote in its entirety:
Sweden is modifying its constitution to ban criticism of homosexuality and alternate lifestyles. How if your alternative lifestyle is based on criticizing homosexuality? More seriously, isn’t the point of freedom of speech to be able to adopt and advocate positions that the majority disagrees with?
Yeah. It’s amazing how many people (and legislators) in supposedly enlightened democracies really don’t get that concept.